Case Study: Custom Anti-Static Fabric for a Sportswear Brand in Finland
Source:Acrylic Photo Keychains /
Time:2026-09-18
Anti-Static Fabric for a Sportswear Brand in Finland
A Sportswear Brand approached us with a anti-static fabric requirement for the Finland market. The brief was specific: a defined look, a hard launch date and a unit cost that had to survive freight and duty. This case study records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order was delivered.
The challenge
- An interlining that bubbled after the first press
- A spec that lived in an email instead of a tech pack
- MOQ that was quoted per colourway rather than per style
What we specified
| Item | Anti-Static Fabric |
|---|---|
| Client type | A Sportswear Brand |
| Market | Finland |
| Order volume | 100,000 pieces across 3 specifications |
| Base material | Polyester |
| Standard size | 450 gsm |
| Finish | UV Printing |
| Sampling rounds | 2 |
| Delivery window | 8 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | REACH SVHC Screening |
How it was resolved
- We rebuilt the specification around Polyester and locked the tolerance before bulk.
- The finish was moved to Anodised Finish after strike-off tests showed better durability.
- A pre-production sample was approved and retained as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
Result
- 100,000 pieces delivered inside the 8-week window.
- Unit cost held within 3.0% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 0.5%.
- The specification is now on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Fix the specification count early. Adding variants after production starts is the most expensive change a client can request.
Planning something similar?
Tell us the item, the quantity and the delivery window. We will quote it with the sub-processes named, so the lead time you approve is the lead time you get.
