Case Study: Custom Aglet for a Sportswear Brand in Finland
Source:Gold Cartilage Earrings /
Time:2026-09-18
Aglet for a Sportswear Brand in Finland
A Sportswear Brand approached us with a aglet requirement for the Finland market. The brief was specific: a defined look, a hard launch date and a unit cost that had to survive freight and duty. This case study records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order was delivered.
The challenge
- Lead time quoted without the plating or dyeing sub-process
- MOQ that was quoted per colourway rather than per style
- A trim that passed sampling but failed in-line because it was never cycle tested
What we specified
| Item | Aglet |
|---|---|
| Client type | A Sportswear Brand |
| Market | Finland |
| Order volume | 20,000 pieces across 4 specifications |
| Base material | Silicone |
| Standard size | 12 mm Width |
| Finish | Anodised Finish |
| Sampling rounds | 4 |
| Delivery window | 5 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | JIS L Standards |
How it was resolved
- We rebuilt the specification around Silicone and locked the tolerance before bulk.
- The finish was moved to Rainbow Iridescent Finish after strike-off tests showed better durability.
- A pre-production sample was approved and retained as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
Result
- 20,000 pieces delivered inside the 5-week window.
- Unit cost held within 3.0% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 0.5%.
- The specification is now on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Approve a pre-production sample made from the actual bulk base material. Substitute material behaves differently in finishing.
Planning something similar?
Send the reference sample or tech pack and we will come back with a costed specification, a sampling timetable and the compliance documents your market requires.
