Case Study: Custom Swing Ticket for a Bag and Luggage Maker in Indonesia
Source:Silk Sunflower Decor /
Time:2026-09-18
Swing Ticket for a Bag and Luggage Maker in Indonesia
A Bag and Luggage Maker approached us with a swing ticket requirement for the Indonesia market. The brief was specific: a defined look, a hard launch date and a unit cost that had to survive freight and duty. This case study records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order was delivered.
The challenge
- MOQ that was quoted per colourway rather than per style
- Shrinkage that only showed up after the first wash
- An interlining that bubbled after the first press
What we specified
| Item | Swing Ticket |
|---|---|
| Client type | A Bag and Luggage Maker |
| Market | Indonesia |
| Order volume | 2,000 pieces across 6 specifications |
| Base material | Ceramic |
| Standard size | 38 mm Width |
| Finish | Epoxy Doming |
| Sampling rounds | 3 |
| Delivery window | 5 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | BSCI |
How it was resolved
- We rebuilt the specification around Ceramic and locked the tolerance before bulk.
- The finish was moved to UV Printing after strike-off tests showed better durability.
- A pre-production sample was approved and retained as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
Result
- 2,000 pieces delivered inside the 5-week window.
- Unit cost held within 2.0% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 1.0%.
- The specification is now on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Lock the material standard before sampling. Once the base changes, every downstream approval has to be redone and the calendar slips.
Planning something similar?
Tell us the item, the quantity and the delivery window. We will quote it with the sub-processes named, so the lead time you approve is the lead time you get.
