Case Study: Custom Leather Patch for a Supermarket Own-Brand Team in India
Source:Gold Earrings /
Time:2026-09-18
Leather Patch for a Supermarket Own-Brand Team in India
A Supermarket Own-Brand Team approached us with a leather patch requirement for the India market. The brief was specific: a defined look, a hard launch date and a unit cost that had to survive freight and duty. This case study records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order was delivered.
The challenge
- MOQ that was quoted per colourway rather than per style
- An interlining that bubbled after the first press
- Elastic that lost recovery after three washes
What we specified
| Item | Leather Patch |
|---|---|
| Client type | A Supermarket Own-Brand Team |
| Market | India |
| Order volume | 100,000 pieces across 3 specifications |
| Base material | Aluminium |
| Standard size | 6 mm Width |
| Finish | UV Printing |
| Sampling rounds | 3 |
| Delivery window | 4 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | BSCI |
How it was resolved
- We rebuilt the specification around Aluminium and locked the tolerance before bulk.
- The finish was moved to Rose Gold Plating after strike-off tests showed better durability.
- A pre-production sample was approved and retained as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
Result
- 100,000 pieces delivered inside the 4-week window.
- Unit cost held within 3.0% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 1.0%.
- The specification is now on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Keep one accountable owner on both sides. Most delays come from hand-offs, not from machines.
Planning something similar?
Tell us the item, the quantity and the delivery window. We will quote it with the sub-processes named, so the lead time you approve is the lead time you get.
