Case Study: Custom Shell Button for a Lingerie Specialist in Belgium
Source:Faux Vintage Clock Faces /
Time:2026-09-18
Shell Button for a Lingerie Specialist in Belgium
A Lingerie Specialist approached us with a shell button requirement for the Belgium market. The brief was specific: a defined look, a hard launch date and a unit cost that had to survive freight and duty. This case study records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order was delivered.
The challenge
- Lead time quoted without the plating or dyeing sub-process
- Shrinkage that only showed up after the first wash
- A trim that passed sampling but failed in-line because it was never cycle tested
What we specified
| Item | Shell Button |
|---|---|
| Client type | A Lingerie Specialist |
| Market | Belgium |
| Order volume | 50,000 pieces across 4 specifications |
| Base material | Glass |
| Standard size | 15 mm Width |
| Finish | Powder Coating |
| Sampling rounds | 4 |
| Delivery window | 5 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | AATCC Test Methods |
How it was resolved
- We rebuilt the specification around Glass and locked the tolerance before bulk.
- The finish was moved to Brushed Silver Finish after strike-off tests showed better durability.
- A pre-production sample was approved and retained as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
Result
- 50,000 pieces delivered inside the 5-week window.
- Unit cost held within 2.0% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 1.0%.
- The specification is now on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Approve a pre-production sample made from the actual bulk base material. Substitute material behaves differently in finishing.
Planning something similar?
If you are comparing suppliers, send us the spec they quoted against. We will quote the same spec and show you where the difference sits.
