Case Study: Custom Oxford Fabric for a Sportswear Brand in the United States
Source:Hand-Blown Glass Vase /
Time:2026-09-18
Oxford Fabric for a Sportswear Brand in the United States
A Sportswear Brand approached us with a oxford fabric requirement for the the United States market. The brief was specific: a defined look, a hard launch date and a unit cost that had to survive freight and duty. This case study records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order was delivered.
The challenge
- MOQ that was quoted per colourway rather than per style
- Lead time quoted without the plating or dyeing sub-process
- Shade drift between the approved lab dip and the bulk lot
What we specified
| Item | Oxford Fabric |
|---|---|
| Client type | A Sportswear Brand |
| Market | the United States |
| Order volume | 100,000 pieces across 2 specifications |
| Base material | Ceramic |
| Standard size | 110 gsm |
| Finish | Sandblasted Finish |
| Sampling rounds | 2 |
| Delivery window | 10 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | Sedex SMETA |
How it was resolved
- We rebuilt the specification around Ceramic and locked the tolerance before bulk.
- The finish was moved to Sandblasted Finish after strike-off tests showed better durability.
- A pre-production sample was approved and retained as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
Result
- 100,000 pieces delivered inside the 10-week window.
- Unit cost held within 4.5% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 1.0%.
- The specification is now on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Keep one accountable owner on both sides. Most delays come from hand-offs, not from machines.
Planning something similar?
If you are comparing suppliers, send us the spec they quoted against. We will quote the same spec and show you where the difference sits.
