Case Study: Custom Non-Woven Interlining for a Military Supply Contractor in Switzerland
Source:Diamond Earring And Necklace Sets /
Time:2026-09-18
Non-Woven Interlining for a Military Supply Contractor in Switzerland
A Military Supply Contractor approached us with a non-woven interlining requirement for the Switzerland market. The brief was specific: a defined look, a hard launch date and a unit cost that had to survive freight and duty. This case study records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order was delivered.
The challenge
- MOQ that was quoted per colourway rather than per style
- Cartons packed to the factory ratio instead of the buyer's size ratio
- Reorders that quietly changed supplier and changed the hand feel
What we specified
| Item | Non-Woven Interlining |
|---|---|
| Client type | A Military Supply Contractor |
| Market | Switzerland |
| Order volume | 2,000 pieces across 2 specifications |
| Base material | Aluminium |
| Standard size | 3# Gauge |
| Finish | Anodised Finish |
| Sampling rounds | 2 |
| Delivery window | 8 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | EN 71-3 |
How it was resolved
- We rebuilt the specification around Aluminium and locked the tolerance before bulk.
- The finish was moved to Laser Engraved Finish after strike-off tests showed better durability.
- A pre-production sample was approved and retained as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
Result
- 2,000 pieces delivered inside the 8-week window.
- Unit cost held within 2.0% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 1.0%.
- The specification is now on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Approve a pre-production sample made from the actual bulk base material. Substitute material behaves differently in finishing.
Planning something similar?
Tell us the item, the quantity and the delivery window. We will quote it with the sub-processes named, so the lead time you approve is the lead time you get.
