Case Study: Custom Tack Button for a Baby Product Brand in Australia
Source:Large Hole Wooden Beads /
Time:2026-09-18
Tack Button for a Baby Product Brand in Australia
A Baby Product Brand approached us with a tack button requirement for the Australia market. The brief was specific: a defined look, a hard launch date and a unit cost that had to survive freight and duty. This case study records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order was delivered.
The challenge
- A trim that passed sampling but failed in-line because it was never cycle tested
- MOQ that was quoted per colourway rather than per style
- Lead time quoted without the plating or dyeing sub-process
What we specified
| Item | Tack Button |
|---|---|
| Client type | A Baby Product Brand |
| Market | Australia |
| Order volume | 100,000 pieces across 3 specifications |
| Base material | Iron |
| Standard size | 32 mm Width |
| Finish | Pearlescent Coating |
| Sampling rounds | 2 |
| Delivery window | 4 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | CPSIA |
How it was resolved
- We rebuilt the specification around Iron and locked the tolerance before bulk.
- The finish was moved to Glossy Enamel Coating after strike-off tests showed better durability.
- A pre-production sample was approved and retained as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
Result
- 100,000 pieces delivered inside the 4-week window.
- Unit cost held within 4.5% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 1.5%.
- The specification is now on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Keep one accountable owner on both sides. Most delays come from hand-offs, not from machines.
Planning something similar?
Tell us the item, the quantity and the delivery window. We will quote it with the sub-processes named, so the lead time you approve is the lead time you get.
