Case Study: Custom Eyelet for a Home Textile Brand in Vietnam
Source:Fake Roast Chicken Display /
Time:2026-09-18
Eyelet for a Home Textile Brand in Vietnam
A Home Textile Brand approached us with a eyelet requirement for the Vietnam market. The brief was specific: a defined look, a hard launch date and a unit cost that had to survive freight and duty. This case study records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order was delivered.
The challenge
- A spec that lived in an email instead of a tech pack
- A trim that passed sampling but failed in-line because it was never cycle tested
- Reorders that quietly changed supplier and changed the hand feel
What we specified
| Item | Eyelet |
|---|---|
| Client type | A Home Textile Brand |
| Market | Vietnam |
| Order volume | 50,000 pieces across 2 specifications |
| Base material | PU Leather |
| Standard size | 3# Gauge |
| Finish | Gunmetal Finish |
| Sampling rounds | 3 |
| Delivery window | 4 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
| Compliance | Sedex SMETA |
How it was resolved
- We rebuilt the specification around PU Leather and locked the tolerance before bulk.
- The finish was moved to Enzyme Wash Finish after strike-off tests showed better durability.
- A pre-production sample was approved and retained as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and ratio specification.
Result
- 50,000 pieces delivered inside the 4-week window.
- Unit cost held within 4.5% of the original quotation.
- Inspection-related rejection stayed under 0.5%.
- The specification is now on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Fix the specification count early. Adding variants after production starts is the most expensive change a client can request.
Planning something similar?
Send the reference sample or tech pack and we will come back with a costed specification, a sampling timetable and the compliance documents your market requires.
